This place is full of issues I had with people, with institutions. They are not meant to be gossip but are written as case studies, to show human nature and how the world functions. They are basically a way for me to gain insight into how things might work better.
I know people think I should let go. I let go. But then something happens to remind me of the hurtful event and my grievance is triggered.
So I have to just write it down. I write to treat my wounds. Words heal me.
Yeah, they hurt me too.
They hurt me more than they do other people.
I believe in words.
I believe in the moral of words.
I believe that the world would be a much better place if people used their words responsibly and kept them clean.
Unfortunately for me, people are very shitty when using words. They do not get what their words do to people like me, people who live with words.
Yeah, time heals too. You forget.
But then you remember.
When I do, I go to bed and I cannot sleep for hours. That's why I need to write and get it out of my system. That's how I function. I mean if I do not write this stuff, I cannot function. That's my nature. Even though I do not appreciate it, I've come to accept it. I do what I need to do. So that I can go on with my life.
Forgetting the Past
Ah, there are people who advise me to forget the past, or just boast about how they live in the present.
Sorry but what bullshit!
The reason we are here today is because of yesterday, because of the wrongs of yesterday. There is so much to be gained from dissecting and analyzing the past. I know I sometimes get lost in too much detail. But detail is important. That's where the essence lies. The nuance lies.
If we could have healing circles like in some old traditional tribes, where people of the community sat down together and discussed it when some member was grieved or felt violated, things might have worked much better be it in families be it in virtual groups. The modern world might have provided us with so much, yet it has stolen our sense of community and belonging. It is so easy nowadays to walk away from people, groups you do not like. There is some other friend to make or another date on Tinder waiting. The challenge of the next generation will be to be able to form meaningful bonds and then to preserve them.
Don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with discarding the relations which are not working, which are giving you too much pain and trouble. Yet, we still need to give it a try and hold a mature discussion before going separate ways.
It is common knowledge that the width of our circle is around 150. More than that, we cannot keep track of. Just like downsizing, the more you age, the more you long for fewer, distilled relations to keep.
I'm working towards establishing that few now.
This is part of a seven piece series on the EPS- Every Passport Stamp Facebook group and Counting Countries podcast. The following is the foreword to this piece:
My EPS Adventure- Behind the Scenes
Asked to Come Back
A Call to Ric Gazarian's Patrons
Threats and Controversy
My Counting Countries podcast with Ric Gazarian has gone wrong for many reasons, the most important being his claiming I was kicked out of the EPS- Every Passport Stamp group in the introduction. Ric has still not issued a public apology, he has just changed it on the written part in his website and removed the podcast. I make a Call to Ric's Patreons to stop supporting him until he corrects his slander.
Moderators and School Kids
"What about Maurizio Giuliano?? Why is he still there? What about the rules he broke? Oh, some rules are okay to be broken, or is it who breaks the rules, that some people get preferred treatment?" I retorted to Ric after he announced on the podcast I was kicked out from the group.
"If you had an issue with Maurizio Giuliano breaking the rules you should have reported him at that time. I am not aware of him being guilty of any infractions."
“Reported” him??? I was so taken aback by this response. I mean I'm aware most people see this as "normal" and do not see what's wrong with it.
What's wrong is that they are recreating/mimicking a mini-school environment. Moderators as principals, group members as school kids.
"I'm sorry but you seem to see us as school-kids and you are I suppose the principal of the school???" I wrote to Ric.
I had said a similar thing to Stefan. That I'm not a school kid he can scold or threaten with a stick. Excuse me!!!??
"I'm not a school kid who is going to come to you to report that my classmate pulled my hair! All is going on in front of your eyes. You are the moderators, you are supposed to interfere and put your weight in when a discussion gets heated."
What is a moderator for??
Oh I know, they are the police. You report to them and they either put people on time-outs until they cool, or kick people out or simply walk in and close a topic to comments. Well... Not my place to be.
I had several issues with the way Ric launched the podcast.
Apart from his accusation of being kicked out, the biggest issue I had was there was nothing in Ric's introduction about my going to every country to burn passports.
Well... That is the one and main reason why I am going to every country! To just make a point about the stupidity of borders and visas.
That is also why I accepted to be in the podcast in the first place. Otherwise, I have no need to promote myself in search of clicks to make money or to boast about my travels for ego-boost. My only goal is idea promotion.
So someone going to every country to spread his uncle's ashes is something to put on the headline but someone going to every country to burn her passports is not???!!! Is that so???
Come on... It is outrageous...
I found it disrespectful and a big insult to me that there was NO MENTION at all about my burning passports not even an allusion to my core belief of visas and passports being symbols of a global discrimination in the introduction. I took Ric's omission as disrespect and insult because it is something so important to me that I wish to devote my life to it.
I understand, Ric does not approve of my project, he is not sympathetic to my cause but he has to be objective. That is if he is to be a media.
Oh "Gülin has been fighting conformity her entire life..."
Yeah, it is true that I've been fighting conformity all my life but what has that got to do with my travelling to every country in the world??
He could have as well said "Gülin has black hair but it's going white." He would again have been totally right but what has that got to do with my world travel? It is not related. You do not put that on the headline.
Would he have liked it if I did a podcast with him and instead of saying "Ric is going to every country" in the headline I said "Ric took geography lessons at high school." Duh!
Now... To Ric's credit, he changed it after I protested.
However, the main title in the thumbnail stayed the same...
The other thing I bristled at was Ric's portrayal of me.
I was very VERY UPSET and disillusioned that I was reduced to this, leaving my husbands to travel or being outspoken about fellow travelers.
Yes, I have strong opinions and yes, I do not mince my words. Like I did not with speaking against Ric as well.
The other issue was that at some point in the interview Ric told me to answer the questions directly. That was left in the podcast when it was published and I did not like it. It was just like him scolding me in front of everyone again, as if his slander was not enough, this was added on!
Then, listening to Sascha Grabow's interview, I realized he asked the same questions to Sascha twice and he still didn't answer, and Ric didn't say anything, just let it go.
I actually laughed out loud when I was listening, but it was not funny at all. On the contrary, it hurt... It hurt a lot. To be treated differently, to be singled out once again. I cannot help but think this is personal. That I am a woman, that I come from a different background.
He scolds me after asking once; what's worse, he leaves that scolding there for everybody to hear and witness. No editing. And that is the only such uncut conversation in about 60 CC podcasts!
This is his answer and our conversation when I made a comment to Ric about the issue:
Yeah, so his asking me to answer questions directly was left in by error by his editor, so Ric washes away all responsibility from his hands. Perfect!
No apology given. No. He didn't do anything wrong (!) No need for an apology!
On 2/25/2019 at 4:51 PM, Gülin:
Ric... Could you please be more specific about why you think I'm a proponent of fake news, what's the inaccurate and false info? As you have stated yourself, your scolding me and that being left there unedited is correct. I suppose you'd also agree it is the only such unedited conversation in about 60 CC podcasts. As for Sascha's... Would you like to listen to the podcast again, with a new eye, or new ears, looking for the specific thing I pointed out? Don't you think it's best to investigate a bit further into the matter before asking someone if she's a proponent of fake news or telling her what she said is inaccurate and false information? Or perhaps you could have tried asking me where you ask Sascha the same question twice and he still doesn't answer... I'd have answered you, you know.
And don't you think it's rather ironical you come up with accusations of fake news, inaccurate and false info to me? I wish you showed the same sensitivity that you exhibit here -to a comment which almost no one reads- to your own false and inaccurate, if not slanderous comment -that you blasted out in your podcast in the introduction. Let alone a public one, I do not remember even a private apology from you for saying I was “kicked out from the group”, what's more, “for several violations.”
You bet that hurts a lot too. But don't worry, I'm used to such hurts; even bigger ones and from more important people in my life.
It's also very interesting to see you boast about free speech. You are the one who blocked the conversation in EPS, not allowing me to answer the douchebag Maurizio hurling wrong accusations and insults at me without having any idea of the details at the airport during my boarding denial. Of course Petro is the greatest censor in EPS as she dutifully and diligently deleted my perfectly legitimate posts as well. Then talk about free speech and how nice it is; very interesting indeed!
Monday, February 25, 2019 at 7:18 PM, Gülin:
Let alone an apology, you didn't even publish a correction, you simply changed it on the written part, leaving the podcast as is, which meant people who listened still heard me being kicked out of the group. And people listen, do not generally read. After all, it is a podcast!
Show me where I am wrong, where is the fake news, the inaccurate, false info of what I said, you can be sure I will correct my mistake and apologize.
Ric did not reply.
So I am not to take any offense at all this?? I have no right to react to such a thing and he does not owe me an apology?? Not even in private! He doesn't say "I'm sorry about it." No, why should he say that??? He is not even sorry... I mean that is the worst part.
Am I a proponent of fake news??
No, I am not. If he cared to listen he would see, or rather hear how he asked Sacha the same question three times and did not get an answer. But Ric did not scold Sacha like he did me. Why? I don't want to proclaim like he did but I bet because I am a woman. Women are so easy to brush off or to hit on their heads.
Ric is the one with fake news! He is the one who disseminated that I was kicked out when it was me who had left the group!
EPS is the one with fake news! They are the ones insisting on Cassie not being the first woman documented.
I mean okay, we all might make mistakes. But come on... There is something called decency. You apologize when you make a mistake. It's called decency and basic manners.
Ric, instead of answering my points, just changed his introduction, put up my answer to his mails on FB and let all my comments there.
Now... This is just such an awful awful manner!
First of all, pasting a response somewhere without the proper background gives the wrong impression. I am totally aware how I come off.
Second of all, being dismissed is one of the most hurtful things. His non-answer to my, once again, totally valid questions and points makes me the "nutcase."
Yes, it is true: I go on rants! But why?? Why do I need to go on rants? Did it ever occur to anyone??
How come no one can just come out and state what is wrong about the things I say without an ad hominem?
No, I did not take Ric's silence as agreement in my rant but just like this guy watching "crazy" in quiet. Still NO! My reaction was and is totally valid!
If anyone sees what I am doing wrong and shows me, I would be very much obliged.
Ric thinks I am being irrational. Perhaps I am. Could be. But does he give an explanation why he thinks that way? No.
I suppose he doesn't need to. Ad hominems without any reference, without an example. Just like him claiming I was kicked out without knowing anything about what had gone on in the group.
I strongly advise him and other authorities in the group not to have kids at all. They'd make horrible horrible father figures. Blames, accusations without any explanation or reason. They have made the judgement, you don't have the right to know the events to think and evaluate yourself, you just need to take their word for it. Accept what they say. Like this, of course, there is no way to counter-argue. If they give a reason you can say bla bla bla. Then they'd need to discuss and waste their time. It's simple like this.
Their attitude was exactly the same with regards to my “removal” from the group.
I am not saying I am rational according to their standards either huh, don't get me wrong. They are the Americans, they are impacted by the travel ban to DPRK. But as the rational beings they are they do not question let alone revolt against such a ban. I suppose to them, the ban is rational as well.
Well... To me, it is totally irrational. That a stupid 22 year-old died because he did something stupid and I am banned because of that, that I am held in par with such an idiot, that I am told “It is our greatest concern the safety of American citizens,” as if I am not concerned about my OWN safety and I need to rely on them to think for me. As if I am not a mature adult. When even my own mother, the person who carried me for nine months in her belly, who gave birth to me and raised me, when even she CANNOT interfere or have a say over where I can go or not, I puke at the government dictating me that I cannot go somewhere because of safety reasons.
Yes, I am not even an American and I revolt at the DPRK ban. I speak up for it, that is against it. If that makes me the irrational one, yes I am definitely not rational and I accept that “accusation” happily.
If that makes me “attached” and if this is a bad thing, I accept that too. I am attached to certain values. Freedom being one. Justice, truth, integrity, basic decency and maturity being others. Yes, I am obsessed with these.
I am obsessed with taking responsibility and saying sorry when you make a mistake, too.
Ric told me “98% of the people in the group post and comment without any issues or any reporting.”
Yeah, most people are sheeple, they pass through security controls without a problem instead of making a big fuss about it like me. If that makes me irrational, I am more than happy to accept the accusation. In fact, nobody else, apart from me, mentioned any word about this issue in the 70+ Counting Countries podcast. No, I definitely do not fall into the 98 % who has no issues with anybody or anything. In fact, I do not even fall into 99,99 % of any group. And I have no wish to be. If this is your rational world.
No... Please go on with your rational lives and leave me alone.
Tantrums and Rants
This is a part of a series on the EPS- Every Passport Stamp Facebook group and Counting Countries podcast. This is the foreword to this piece:
My EPS Adventure- Behind the Scenes
Asked to Come Back
A Call to Ric Gazarian's Patrons
Ric, to my surprise, asked me if I'd care to get back on the podcast. Not expecting such a proposal, I was disarmed. I accepted it. However, I asked him why. He was honest:
"When I interview people... I want interesting characters. You are interesting since you have good travel stories, and also you have controversial opinions about travel and travel people. Usually that makes a good podcast.
Why i am offering u another opportunity. 1 you seem so upset w the podcast, i am giving you the opportunity to "Set the record straight" and 2 this podcast will probably be even more controversial with you expressing your opinion."
I did not really like his wanting to get controversy. Because you see... When I write and say something, all I am doing is expressing a sincere opinion, wanting a discussion on IDEAS, not people. I'm not looking for controversy like Ric to manipulate hits for profit. I seriously care about the topics I discuss, not about “who did what” gossip. But come and find the mature enough person to engage in such a conversation!
However, I wanted the opportunity to set the record straight. That's something I always want. So I was still fine with going on the podcast again.
However... In the meantime, he published the unedited podcast on his FB group saying "Who could guess travel could be so controversial?" and commented he got a threat to be sued if he didn't take the podcast down.
Now... I believe it is quite understandable that I, as the person who gave the interview and talked about people being the main subject of the threat, wanted to know who this person was coming up with a legal action remark. I didn't think there was any reason cause for legal action in the interview but wanted to understand just in case.
I suppose you would grant me the right to know.
However, Ric was not of the same opinion. "Sorry I can not divulge" he answered.
You see... I'm like the Little Prince a bit, I do not give up on things so easily when I wish to understand. My name was out there. I was the one doing the talking openly. I believed I had a right to know who had threatened and on what grounds.
At that point, Ric was upset and said he was going to take the podcast down.
Yeah I understand, I didn't even have the right to ask!
He said I was tiring. Yes, I am tiring. True. But who is the one tiring who in the first place?!
"I agree Ric," I said. "It is very tiring for me. Had you just answered a simple question with 'Janice (or Jessica). No, of course there isn't anything for legal action in the podcast' or simply said 'I do not want to/cannot divulge because of such and such' it would have been much simpler and easier on both of us."
That was the end of our communication with Ric.
You see... It's very unreasonable (!) and irrational (!) of me to want to know who threatens legal action for the opinions I express!
A Podcast Gone Wrong
Tantrums and Rants
To Steph Rowe, Ted Nims, Bisa Myles, Stephen Rothwell, and Adam Hickman..
This is a request from you to STOP supporting his Counting Countries podcast as his patron.
Because he has done a great injustice and has acted unethically. He basically slandered me and did not post any apologies for it.
Those who are interested may go into the details at My EPS Adventure but in short, I had a bad experience in EPS, I couldn't stand the level of intelligence, the arrogance, the hatred and wanted out.
After some time, Ric asked me to be on his podcast and I accepted. We did the podcast in August 2018. I had just returned from a trip and was still tired. I have been on TV and radio programs before but I was excited to be doing an interview for the first time in English. I wasn't too satisfied with it, the way I talked, you know... you criticize yourself. However, I was glad I got to talk about some of the issues I deem to be very important and do not get talked about.
Anyway... When it came out in October, I was in for a big surprise, a very bad one!
"Gülin was eventually kicked out of the group for violating a number of rules that members must follow." Yeah... So easy to smear and not care!
I asked him:
"What were the group rules that I have violated? If you accuse someone of something, you need to explain them what they have done wrong."
"My recollection is your situation was discussed amongst the moderators and you were voted out for numerous violations," Ric answered.
Oh yeah??!! I was voted out for numerous violations, he announces I am kicked out for several violations, but when I ask, he cannot even mention one thing I did wrong!
Sorry but it is outrageous!
No, I take back the sorry, it is totally outrageous!
All he can come up with is "Oh, there were many complaints about you."
Oh great! I am so happy and relieved to learn that!
I'll give it to Ric that I did not walk out on my own, but he didn't know anything about what had happened to be able to say/broadcast that I was kicked out. This is something that is totally against ethics.
There were also so many other issues with the podcast. I mean not with the podcast itself but how Ric portrayed me. I go into that at A Podcast Gone Wrong
Again to Ric's credit, he changed the introduction after I protested.
However, the podcast was still the same of course. And this being a podcast, people generally do not read the introduction on the website but listen to the podcast.
So I said "I'm hoping you are going to be updating that too."
He said it would take some time. But I didn't want people to be listening to the podcast like that. Not one person more had to hear that. So I asked him to take the podcast down.
That is, not right away.
On the contrary, he published it on another portal saying it was controversial and had gotten a threat to be sued. This upset me even more. Because obviously, he was using me, trying to get clicks.
I was also upset about Maurizio Giuliano who had acted horribly in the group and not had any repercussions.
Ric asked me "Who cares about Maurizio, why do you keep writing paragraph upon paragraph on him?"
"I care about that idiot Maurizio because he is still considered a “respectable” member of the society while I am ostracized! And you, too, should care!" I wrote to Ric. "Do you have any idea, I mean can you imagine how frustrating it is to be told I have been kicked out of a group for SEVERAL violations, and this being told not in person but ANNOUNCED PUBLICLY, and when I ask what rules I have violated, you are not able to name even ONE single violation. No example no nothing! “Ah I remember you've been reported several times.” What have I been reported for? By whom?
The damage is done Ric. The damage is done. You posted that thing out there, now everybody (well, whoever that everybody is... I don't know how many people are in your mail-list and how many people actually listen or care, but still... obviously it is high enough that companies pay you or sponsor you thinking some people will care) thinks I am a person who violates rules, who is some sort of, I don't know, a “wrong” person. After all, I was KICKED OUT, right? I want a public apology Ric, I want a public apology from you, in the mail-list and on FB and Twitter as well, I want it cleared. For anybody who could care. I want my name cleared. As I said, I do not care the least bit for whatever people think of me, everybody is entitled to their opinion, but ONLY as long as it is based on accurate facts; I do not like smears. And sorry to say, that is a slur. You know, even if you make a correction after a mistake, you cannot undo it. The stain remains; people remember the first thing they read. They have already registered things. And I don't like it.
I will also ask you to reinstate me to the group. Make Maurizio apologize for his wrong claims (RyanAir) and for his wrong accusations (that I was seeking your pity), or he is removed from the group. I would also like Stefan to publicly scold him for talking about pregnant girls, something that is completely irrelevant to the group topic.
I don't know... I really shouldn't have had to say all these things in the first place. I keep wasting my time trying to right wrongs that shouldn't have happened, that shouldn't be happening in the first place. Or that should have been prevented by people running a community, a company, a country.
Anyway... Again, I know I cannot force any of these on you. I don't even need to say do as you wish. I just wish that one day I won't be disillusioned with my trust in people doing the right thing."
Think of this... Imagine a situation:
One day, you hear from the administration of your child's school that s/he's been kicked out from school because of several violations. What would you do? Mind you, until that moment, you have never, never ever, not even once, have heard of anything from the school. I suppose any parent would naturally ask “What did s/he do?” That's what I asked Ric after I heard the announcement in my podcast that I was kicked out from school, sorry EPS. So this was even worse, imagine you heard it blasted from the city radio that your child was kicked out from school for several violations. Anyway, so you ask the most natural question, wanting to know: “What did s/he do?” The management, who blasted this news, tells you “Well, there were many complaints about your child.”
???? And?... What were those? I suppose you'd naturally want to know what your child did.
The management says “Oh, I don't know. But many people complained.”
Now... This would never ever happen to you. You would never ever send your child to such a shitty school. If your child does anything, if there is any complaint from any other classmate or parent of a classmate, you'd naturally expect the administration to inform you about it. Give you a chance to evaluate and discuss the issue. No. You are not given any such opportunity, you are just considered a shitbag, and your name is slandered. Oh great!
So, if by any chance you have enrolled your child to such a school, you'd be glad s/he was out anyway and would not want your child to attend such a shitty school anyway. Ah, if you say anything against the administration, question their competence, ah they label you “an irrational player.”
Perfect civility. From the citizens of the greatest country in the world!
I am sick and tired of people accusing me when I react to their mistakes and my reaction is totally valid!
Taking responsibility and saying sorry when you make a mistake. I am obsessed with this. My recent favorite is a Seneca quote:
Yes, 'To err is human, but to persist in the mistake is diabolical.”
And so many people insist on their mistakes. That's one thing that makes the world a horrible place and escalates problems that could just dissipate easily if the one in the wrong was courageous enough to accept his mistake.
If only Ric had just acknowledged and apologized, there would have been one less person who felt mistreated.
I know, or rather I learnt that there are so many, in fact too many people who do not know how to apologize but come on... If you are making a podcast, if you are doing public media, there are some manners to go about, to follow when you make a mistake.
“Correcting or Retracting Your Work After Publication” published on August 21, 2019 by Digital Media Law states:
“Responding to a retraction request will vary with the nature of your statements and the details of your state's retraction statute or case law. Generally speaking, to be effective, a retraction must be a "frank and full" withdrawal of the defamatory accusation. Merely stating that the subject of the statement denies the accusation is not enough, nor is a weak, grudging, or half-hearted correction. Additionally, the retraction must appear in a manner comparable to that of the original publication and be disseminated to the same audience.”
Yes! Exactly! Ric should retract his words, not just change them on his website so people do not even understand my reaction. Plus, you don't just delete the podcast and unburden yourself of responsibility. The wrong information you broadcasted and the correction needs to be disseminated to the same audience in the same way!
Ric still needs to broadcast the retraction on his podcast.
This is the New York Times. On the article “Make No Mistake, but if You Do, Here’s How to Correct It” by Margaret Sullivan published on January 16, 2013 it says how they do NOT change articles when they realize they have made a mistake, they add a correction. If they ever do change it, they “without exception, acknowledge and explain at the bottom that 'an earlier version of this article'.... screwed up whatever. (Let us count the ways.)”
So Ric had to count the ways he screwed up saying I was kicked out for several violations. He still has that responsibility and obligation.
“Greg Brock retired from The Times; he was not fired.” Any person so maligned would want The Times to point every reader to that correction – in huge type.
Yes, I was maligned and I want that correction in HUGE TYPE. And I want it disseminated to the same audience!
Call to Ric's Patrons
What do I need to do to have Ric apologize to me in public? What is the practical solution and the pragmatic approach? What is the better way to accomplish my objective?
To me, the only way is to pressure his patrons. He knows he is wrong too. But he will never acknowledge it on his own. If he was decent, he'd have done it long time ago, on his own in the first place.
So this is a request from you to face Ric about his public slandering, to make pressure on him to make a public apology and to STOP supporting his Counting Countries podcast as his patron if he does not. For you to Please stop supporting Ric until he apologizes Publicly!
PS: Do I really think that any of Ric's patrons will actually read, care and stop supporting Ric? Not really. Even Ryan, who is someone who understands me, who has said I was a thought-leader in his life, who wanted to get me back in EPS, who is now also a moderator in the group did not care enough to do that. Or rather, he didn't want to compromise his interests. For I believe he has some intentions to grow his audience and do something in the travel industry as well.
Oh well... That's life. That's how the world works. On interests, on where your loyalties lie.
But then why... If I don't think that any of Ric's patrons will care about my call, if I don't think that Ric will ever apologize to me even in private let alone publicly... then why do I still take pains to write all this stuff??
Well... That's a good question. A question that even I am not able to answer. Perhaps it is a way of procrastination not to work on my books which are so important for me, or perhaps it is a way to work out my problems with people and to understand myself better. Perhaps it is to idly amuse myself to pass the time, or perhaps it is psychotherapy to get over my grievances. Or yet another perhaps, it is much more than that, it is an attempt at conveying a greater message to people. Or it is simply a push I have.
Whatever it is... I wrote it. What you want to do with it is none of my business. That is left to you.
My EPS Adventure- Behind the Scenes
Asked to Come Back
Threats and Controversy
A Podcast Gone Wrong
Tantrums and Rants
Months had past after my adventure in EPS- Every Passport Stamp.
It was summer time. I had forgotten all about EPS and was into my life arranging our summer house in Kaş, Turkey. One night, to my astonishment, I received an e-mail from Ric. He was asking me if I'd be on his Counting Countries podcast.
You see, I had written to him asking to be on the podcast before. I had wanted to promote my ideas. I was a different voice, a Turkish woman with Muslim origins and had something to say about travel. He had not responded to any of my requests. But, I am used to being ignored. So I had not thought much about it.
Now that he was asking me, I was perplexed. It was something I had not expected.
I said ok. Here is a chance.
Some time later, I got a message from Stefan too.
He was saying they were thinking of taking me back into the group, if I was interested. He said they welcomed different points of view but then ended with:
"If you can agree to our group rules and participate in the spirit of them, we will reinstate you. If we feel you are breaking the group rules or that member complaints for rule breaking rise again, we will be quick to act. We have had several other members that for similar reasons we have issued two week mutes on posting to cool off and see if they can come back to the group."
Now... This, being an invitation to come back to a group that had hurt me, should have been flattering. However, I was not. In fact, I found Stefan's "tone" to be too authoritarian to be even called despotic; I certainly did not appreciate the threatening manner "If we feel you are breaking the group rules or that member complaints for rule breaking rise again, we will be quick to act." He was literally showing me a stick! Just in case!
"Thanks for your offer Stefan but I'm good like this. I believe you've got me wrong and did not get to read my last posts. I asked to be removed from the group. You may say 'Why didn't you simply leave yourself?' It's because I have left too many groups and for once, I wanted not to do it myself."
Then I went on to tell him about my experience in the group as I was sure he didn't follow and did not know about it as Petro had removed my last comments.
"You may have your rules but I too have my own rules and the group does not abide by them," I told Stefan.
"What about obliging people who make ridiculously wrong claims like RyanAir 'choosing to' compensate passengers to apologize for example? Act mature, accept your wrongs, or be kicked out of the group.
Are you aware Maurizio dared say I was seeking your pity?
Seek your pity??? For what? For what for God's sake??! I have told from the beginning that I have been REFUNDED!
Again... PEOPLE MAKING BASELESS ACCUSATORY CLAIMS SHOULD BE EITHER OBLIGED TO APOLOGIZE PUBLICLY OR BE immediately REMOVED FROM THE GROUP."
Then I made a case about their running the group:
"May I also say I do not appreciate your threatening 'tone of voice' or manner stating you'll be quick to take action if I do not abide by your rules. (I do not take kindly to authority, especially when it is issued as threats. I had told you before, I'm not a 6 year-old that you can scold.) If you were quick to take action to defend me from baseless attacks before I had to answer them myself, this might not have happened. I'm aware you are not very active on FB, neither is Ric. Petro interferes, she does the policing in the group. But her way is very irritating as well. Like her making a post about wanting to 'nip it in the bud'. I don't like insinuations. Be direct if you want to say something. Her arguments are all illogical as well."
There was palpable double-standards in the group moderation. I said:
"There really should be a rule for acting maturely and apologizing when you make a wrong assertion etc as in Maurizio guy. I wonder why you didn't scold him publicly like you did with me, he was TALKING ABOUT PREGNANT GIRLS FOR GOD'S SAKE. I am curious if you have at least issued a personal warning to Maurizio. I hope you did. If not, I believe you need to give some serious thought to your double-standards."
I also made a general comment about world travellers:
"Just like Ric's podcast the group talk is all about our exploits. Yeah, sure, it's nice to listen to adventure stories, share them, but those do not really interest me. I'd like to talk about the politics behind travel. I'd like to discuss visas, security issues... There is an enormous amount of accumulation there. But I do have a huge amount of experience that I can draw upon anyway. I need like-minded people, I need people to support me; when I say me, it's of course not about me but the idea of a stateless political world. Obviously, none of these issues can be brought up in the group. Which is a shame if you ask me. We are world travellers, we should care about the world we wish to see!
In your podcast with Ric, when he asked how you were going to do Syria you said “They have serious problems, ours are so insignificant.” I felt that was such a good point to get the discussion going. Ric did not even make a comment and that was the end of an opportunity.
Anyway... Last point... I suppose we probably do not agree on what a “rant” is. These things are so relative and depend on your definitions like one man's terrorist being the freedom fighter of another. You may call this or my posts as a rant, I think of them as well thought out analysis and expressions of ideas/opinions. If you believe you can adjust your definitions and rules to coincide with mine, I'd be happy to join you. Otherwise, all the best.
PS: I used capitals not as shouting but as using bold character."
Stefan replied saying "Thank you for your thoughtful comments. To address all of your feedback is beyond my capacity though I have read it all, will work with moderators on issues you mentioned, and that will inform group work going forward whether or not you participate. There is a nuance that I believe you have not fully considered which is that any group or community has norms shaped by the members. Within EPS this has meant that I have gone along with, for instance, a normal around not engaging in political debates as the collective membership prefers other outlets specific to that. That is not my natural preference, however I have adopted it in the spirit of comity of the group. A similar one is that the group is not to be the group for heated debates between a handful of members that dominate discussions and shout out others. We recently had to work with several members acting in this way, some of which have chosen other forums as their future outlets."
I replied saying thanks as well and added I was not a group person. I've known that for quite some time. My ideas are not the generally held ones, I am out of the norm. Therefore, do not fit in.
"I see it that people cannot really grasp the fact of someone doing something for unselfish reasons. I could not care less about Cassie, but I do care very much about fairness. That's why I spent all that time writing and defending her.
I understand very well the group dynamics. Believe me when I say I had no intention to even speak up in the group at all. I know very well not to put my political ideas in such a group. Even if it was not moderated, I'd never have posted anything about my project. I don't need needless controversy as much as you don't. It drains my energies and eats my time. However, I thought this Djibouti visa thing was something that concerned all travellers and I could never have imagined people coming back with such attacks. Now I know a bit better. People in groups behave awfully. It easily turns into a mob mentality.
Even if you do not address all my points, could you please let me know if Maurizio was issued any warning at all?
Anyway... I haven't found my tribe yet. I hope I will one day. Perhaps I'll form my own. But I realized I am perfectly fine in my solitary life with my 3+1 small family. It's peaceful like this.
I had got myself the nickname Nomadic Turtle almost two decades ago. I stick out my head once in a while to see what is around, then see how cruel and immature people are and tuck my head back in.
I have heard that there was some discontent in the group and a new formation. I suppose it's natural as well. It's very difficult to get along in a group of people. I hope things will change one day and we will learn how to live peacefully side by side, but I'm not holding my breath on that. A fish rots from the head down; have a look at the “leaders” of the world, or have a look at most micro families, it doesn't seem much promising."
I ended with a quote I believed fit our conversation topic perfectly!
I did not hear back from Stefan. Not even a yes or no if Maurizio had been issued a warning. Yeah, I take it personally. If this much discrimination is so obvious. Yet, I know it is not personal. People are just too busy with their own lives and do not care about some random stranger, someone they have not met and are not interested in. They do not bother to read and understand the details of some random person's grievances.
But, that is exactly the point! That is the big thing that is missing in groups. A sense of community that makes everyone included and cared about.
As I said, you need not even care for people especially. (I did not/do not care about Cassie either.) But you should at least care about values. Because without them, you are just a bunch of robots, avatars, and not humans with an intellect to distinguish between right and wrong. And that makes all the difference.
Following Posts in the series:
A Call to Ric Gazarian's Patrons
Threats and Controversy
A Podcast Gone Wrong
Tantrums and Rants
Level of Intelligence
It all started with the argument of Cassie de Pecol and her being the first documented woman to go to every country or not.
Janice Lintz, who was one of the most active members of EPS* at the time had written a post about Cassie on Huffington Post. Finding her post devoid of logic, I had to speak up on defense of Cassie. (You see, I don't care the least bit about Cassie but I care for injustice.) So I wrote a piece The First Documented as a reply to Ms Lintz's piece. As I was at it, I also wrote The Fight Over First and The Pissing Match in Travel. (You see, I find all this fight over being the first and the pissing match deplorable.) People are travelling the world with no dent in their ignorance. They are Playing the Every Country Game without even realizing they are playing a game and understanding anything about the reality of the world beyond themselves. They live in a world apart.
(* EPS- Every Passport Stamp is an extreme travellers Facebook group)
Anyway... Going back to the level of intelligence of the group... I'll spare you the unbearable details and just get to the heart. This is the exchange when a moderator "walked in" to interfere in the conversation which was getting heated.
Ryan Gazder was the only one who put a like on my answer. However, he had put a like on Petro's post as well. I told him that he was on my side ;) but he said he didn't take himself or anything seriously... It sort of is a shame when the few intelligent/smart people who get things do not care and do not take a stand. But that's life. That's humanity!
Now... At this point, I normally would have left such a group. A group where some "stupid" person refers me to a podcast and a personal book as documentation by authority as an argument and gets 5 likes!!.... No no no... That shows the quality, or rather the non-quality of the group. Or should I state it openly?... The imbecility of the group.
Or it is the immaturity of accepting a wrong.
Whichever it is, I certainly wish to have nothing to do with such people.
Plus, what makes it all worse is this person is a moderator in the group! Come on!...
I would never be "ruled over" by such a person unless I have no other choice. I detest any sort of authority over me let alone an imbecilic one. I am obliged by the political system of the world to abide by many idiotic rules and to be ruled over by power hungry individuals but I don't suffer fools gladly.
Still... I persevered. I had got out of so many groups before, this time I wanted to stick around.: at least until the end of my mission.
But the same issue continued at another level with other people as well.
Jessica and Dumb!
There was a post about a podcast with Jessica Nabongo who was trying to become the first African-American woman to every country. In the podcast, Jessica had talked about Cassie without even mentioning her name and oh, there was so much hatred towards Cassie, especially Janice Lintz, and she didn't miss the opportunity.
I was so very much bothered with this snickering and mocking of Cassie, these two women talking so obnoxiously: Janice hanging on to some mysterious obsessive grudge against Cassie, and Jessica not looking at herself,
This woman, that is Jessica, was running to 90 countries in 13 months herself; I mean that was her plan and she was boasting about this. Yet, she was criticizing Cassie for being to every country in the fastest category!?? What is the point of travelling to 90 countries in 13 months and how different is it than just going to the airport?
Yeah yeah, she interacts with people and experiences the culture!
Rudeness or Incapability or Immaturity?
Now... I take it to be extremely rude not to answer a simple question. However, I have come to learn very well that if someone does not answer a simple question it is because s/he cannot answer it.
Plus, of course, it means they are not mature enough to take back their words when shown clear evidence of their irrationality.
Dumb and Dumber
Then there was this conversation where Jessica retorted with the following response to people making a valid point about her.
Yes, it is a wonder that such "prestigious" media outlets found this to be "newsworthy" even without her accomplishing the task.
Jessica was just one of those self-entitled ego-centric travellers and I responded with A Black Woman versus a Poor Afghani
While I do not doubt that it is difficult to travel as a black woman, it is indisputable that the main challenge of travel is not your gender but the passport you hold and Jessica has an American passport plus a Ugandan one. End of discussion.
I still endured the group. However, there came another red light. This time from the founder of the group himself.
Mogadishu- An Open Scolding
I had been wanting to go to Mogadishu for a long time but it was expensive to go on your own as you needed to pay for armed guards. So I decided to put a post asking to see if anyone would be interested to share expenses.
Jason Thomas responded:
To me, we were having a friendly "tiff" if that is the right word... and this time Stefan walked in! Which is something unheard and unseen of, let me tell you. There had been so many arguments and bad-mouthing in so many other posts but in none did I see Stefan say a word. In fact, he rarely contributed to the group, he basically wasn't around.
So when he did this, it hit me; it hit me hard.
What was this?? Why were we being singled out?? I was seriously taken aback by such a scolding out in the open for everyone to witness.
I wrote the following answer to Stefan but cannot find the screenshot for it:
"Petro, Rick, Caroline Santina Lupini, Alexander Fleming...
Sorry but why are we singled out with Jason to be reprimanded like children here? Especially given that the discussion had ended for us, after the thread has been idle for so many days?... Especially given that there are so many insults going on in other threads in this group.
I have nothing against Jason. Don't know about his view of me but I even like him in a way. The meme I posted was not for him, it was referring to other people in another thread, I'm hoping and believe he got it.
Why did you feel the need to single us out here Stefan? Or am I wrong, are there other people you did this? If so, sorry, I just haven't come across any.
Sebastian said “Are you on drugs?” I wasn't offended, didn't feel the need to take it personally as I am not. However, is that a fine thing to say? No warnings for that? Or somebody had called me “dolt”, I did not know what it meant and thought it was some misspelling, then by chance, found out the meaning. I believe it has been removed, but why not warn people who use such words? Are they fine to use, are they civil?
This conversation is DUMB! (Not my sentence. I copied from Jessica Nabongo. But I suppose it is not an insult and it is not uncivil as it didn't get any comment from any moderator. So I suppose it would be fine if I use it too?)
In my first round-the-world tour Jody and Sally went to the mercato in Ethiopia. They were looking for t-shirts. They went into a shop. The man looked at Jody and said “Okay for you” He looked at Sally and said “No, you are fat.”
They went into another shop. The man said “Yes for her, but no for you. You are fat." When the same thing happened a third time, Sally started to get irritated. She was protesting "Don't these people know it's an insult to call a person fat?" That's when she realized that we were in Ethiopia: a country where there was famine. So it actually was a compliment for them to say that she was fat. Her plumpness was a sign showing she had food to eat and was healthy.
So perhaps we have a cultural misunderstanding here. Would be nice if you please clarify things a bit more on what is appropriate and what not.
And do you believe making false accusations without any proof is fine? I suppose it is as it has been tolerated in this group without any reprimand. Or is it fine and tolerated if the false accusation is directed to a person identified en masse as a hate target?
You have put rules for us, what about rules for moderators? What about not using double-standards for example?"
I ended my post like this:
Mind you, here I clearly stated that I would normally get out of such a group but wanted to leave them the pleasure of removing me. "Nip it in the bud" was Petro's way of getting back to me for her stupid comment. She had made a separate post reminding the rules, not responding to me directly but obviously insinuating
At that point, I had grown very disenchanted with the group. Yet, I wanted to persevere. For once.
I had written what I thought and Stefan did not respond. I took this silence as acceptance of my criticisms and let it go one more time.
But then, Djibouti denied boarding happened.
Djibouti and Reaching the End of My Limit
For more than 25 years, Djibouti had VOA-Visa On Arrival for every country and that's what I was told by the French Embassy and the Honorary Djibouti consul here in Italy. However, when I went to the airport, I was denied boarding because Djibouti had, at a whim, decided to cancel VOA.
What is more annoying is that they reversed the decision and went back to VOA five days later. So my misfortune was that I had my flight on one of those days.
Now... As this is an extraordinary circumstance that is beyond my control, Turkish Airlines should have reissued me my ticket even though it was non-refundable. However, they did not and kept parroting "Visas are the responsibility of the passenger."
Thinking this to be an issue which interested all travellers, I wrote an article about it and posted it in the group. That was where the donkey fell- that is, the moment of truth hit.
When I had joined the group, I had said to myself that I'd never be getting into such issues about visas and passports. I know that it gets me into trouble if I say what I believe out loud in groups. I know the topic is controversial. So I avoided bringing it up. It was my challenge to stay in the group until I finished my mission. Apparently, I couldn't succeed. I thought I had posted something innocent. Thinking people would back me up on this. After all, they are all travellers and they could be in my shoes any time. I got reactions I'd never have expected from such a group. It opened up the Pandora's Box.
I was surprised at how people started attacking me and holding me responsible for something that was beyond my control. IATA rules provide for extraordinary circumstances and obviously this was obviously an extraordinary situation, being changed for only 5 days and going back to VOA.
People started pointing fingers at me, blaming me. Again... This is a travelling group, I thought they would all be backing me up on this. Because, duh! the same thing can happen to them any time! And it sure is not right that visas change on a whim without any prior notice.
I told them I had been refunded by the credit card because businesses are not supposed to charge for services the customer did not get. What's more, I was also rewarded the ticket fare by the Consumer Rights Court on the grounds that it was against the normal flow of life for me to know about a five day change in a visa scheme that had been going on for so long.
I also brought up the topic of how RyanAir had to look after its passengers and pay for their accommodation and food when the volcano in Iceland erupted and flights were cancelled. Even though I believe that in this case it goes to extreme, there is something called passenger rights.
Maurizio Giuliano started claiming Ryan Air did it because it wished to! Hahahaha! Ridiculousness of the claim! We are talking about an airline which tries to milk money from its passengers who do not comply with rules. Mind you, I like RyanAir, I support RyanAir, it has its rules and if you are proper you are rewarded for it. However, it certainly is not an airline that would dish out money to its passengers unless obliged to.
Then this douchebag Maurizio said "Did you try to solve your issue creatively? Apparently not. You just wanted to be victimised and have a fight with the airline and then seek our pity” and he went on about pregnant girls and how one girl in Kenya or some place in Africa got pregnant and was claiming that the government had to look after the child as they did not let her have an abortion.
I was like "Wohaaaa!"
How dare anyone make such a claim without knowing all the details?? How can anyone accuse me of “seeking pity” after I stated I have ALREADY been REFUNDED? Why should I appeal to anyone's pity? People really have no comprehension of someone wanting to do something for the overall good of people and for principles! Idiots!
And pregnant girls??? Now we are discussing legality of abortions and government interference in our lives in a travel group?? Wohaaa!!
But you see, I do not live attached to Facebook and by the time I saw those messages and was about to answer, the comments were turned off by Ric, the moderator.
At that point, I decided to leave the group. This, definitely, was not a place for me. I did not enjoy being attacked but I could have endured that; however, I could never accept my right to answer being taken away from me.
True, other posts were closed to comments before, but those were just bickerings about the way people travelled. So they went nowhere. Whereas here, I believed I had a right to defend myself and say a word or two to those imbeciles.
I wanted out of the group, that's for sure. But I didn't want to get out myself. As I said, for once, I didn't want to just walk out and leave.
Stefan had made a post after this issue talking about rules, restricting comments to three sentences bla bla... So I decided to answer that in a provocative way and make them remove me.
I, unfortunately, did not think of taking screenshots at that point, I was so pissed off. But here are my last posts to the group:
"With all due respect Stefan... I don't believe anything worthwhile can be discussed in three sentences. Apart from short specific information that is. If you want, please restrict all comments to three sentences and let's see how the 'quality' increases.
I know I am the one insinuated with long rants. I deem them to be well-thought out arguments but I'm aware most people have other opinions which they are, of course, entitled to. I believe most people do not have the capacity (or the desire) to read and more importantly try to understand what is written before responding. And that causes most of the troubles.
I also know this will be harsh but some people are so tiny that they cannot imagine someone wanting to do something for others. I really wonder how can anyone even think I am after my own interest when I have explicitly stated in the post that I have been refunded!
I believe this is a very important issue indeed, and concerns all travellers. We are still bound by contracts which talk about “In case of lost tickets”! Which age are we living in?
It's NOT ONLY ME, YOU ARE BOUND by these contracts too. But I see that people prefer to just cover themselves by insurances or eat it up. So be it.
Sure, I am selfish too. First, I want to cover my ass. But after I have done that, as I have done with passports and the Djibouti ticket, I want to cover other people's asses too.
I prefer to do the Smart Donkey... but in this case it is not so easy and I need people like you. I see nobody is interested. There are 269 likes on my website on that post. All came from here. Still... Putting a “like” is the laziest and lamest passive support. Just SPEAK UP and say you agree or something at least. Anyway... This is what I get from a group whose interests are concerned. May I be damned if I try to get anybody involved again!"
Petro had said: “I want to encourage you to go read the group rules on self promotion. This is your warning now.”
And my head had hit the ceiling at that too. That that woman with no brain (see above) was giving me a warning!!!
"I have many issues with this. Starting from the fact that there is no WARNING for people who talk about ABORTION for God's sake!
I will NOT take accusations of self-promotion. I'd have hoped that everybody in such an elite group would be able to see this by having a quick look at my website. Apparently not. So even though I loath to say the following, I'll need to spell it out for some people to understand.
I have done three round-the-world tours, one by land, one by sea, one with my family. I met my Italian husband on my second rtw tour. I have a very romantic story to which I can add some really sensational details like starting the trip running away from a marriage where a gun had been taken out, ending the trip I started solo as three, a man by my side and a baby in my womb. I did the third around the world in 99 Days returning on my daughter's 4th birthday. So... If anybody does not see it and I need to state it: If I wanted to self-promote, I'd have easily been a celebrity definitely in Turkey and in Italy too. I did NOT take that road.
Perhaps I should have. If I had spent my energies on finishing that world tour book instead of concentrating on the stupid things travel entails, movement around the world we were all born, I might have been somewhere by now. Then, people might have taken me seriously or listened to me.
I have hundreds of pages, almost all on different aspects of freedom of movement; articles on other related issues connect to the right of free movement, other issues are all related to philosophical essays on world politics. Nobody would go to such great lengths to write about this stuff if s/he did not really care about it. If I chose to spend my labor on this, it shows where my priorities and loyalties lie.
Nobody would write all these hundreds of articles, spend so much time and effort on these matters just to self-promote. That would be a ridiculously laughable claim. It's obvious that the way of self-promotion for me would have been emphasizing my travels and life. That's where the glamour is. Where all the glory and fame is. Okay, let's not call it fame but all the praise is. I'd have had many fans if I took that road.
Where I stand is lonely.
If I'm promoting anything, I am only promoting ideas. And they are all travel related ideas. If you wish, feel free to update your rules as “No idea-promotion either.”
This brings me to other rules that are missing in your rules:
* What about knowing your place?
Again from Petro: “Please focus on your travels more than your personal views.”
I don't know about you but I do not take orders, even if they come with a please in front of it, from nobodies in my life and no authorities on anything. That right/privilege/entitlement is only reserved to my mother, husband and a few of my trusted friends. I could have taken it as a parently suggestion if it was somebody elder or if it was said with a different tone, but I consider that insolence. Especially coming from someone who is two decades younger than me, a novice traveller, not to mention someone who admittedly is on drugs and has mental issues. Sorry, I wouldn't have liked to bring this up, not to make anyone's situation worse, but seriously, this is crossing the line. You may not like or agree with my views, but I came to this after so much experience, reading, thinking and writing, so they deserve some respect at least.
My travels and my personal views on travel are INSEPARABLE, they make up an integrated whole. My travels made me who I am today. I was a “normal” person not questioning much and taking things the way they are as granted at the beginning of my second round-the-world tour ten years ago.
Ah, sure. You'll be saying there are rules in this group and I need to respect them. If you believe I'm breaking the rules, please feel free to remove me. As I said, I am not leaving myself, but I sure vote for my expulsion! ;)
* Whatever I shared here are at least all related to travel, visa stories, or airport security searches. I believe this should be a part of the general discussion in such a group. At least once. Just to get a general view.
Even if not... Where is the WARNING to people talking about ABORTION for God's sake!? Where is it?
Please... Please... Take responsibility and show some proper standards when applying rules. The place is full of people criticizing other people's way of travel even after that rule was put in. There is only one general “reminder” for everybody, no singling out or no blocking or removing such comments. If you expect respect for your rules or yourself as rulers, you should at least be fair and consistent in application, not have double-standards.
* Same goes for Cassie... Being civil and fair should be applied for every person even if we do not like them personally. So let me come to the next issues:
* I think one of the most important rules that is missing here would people being obliged to act like adults and say sorry when they make a false accusation/claim. Just think how different the conversation had been if people had said:
“Yes, you are right. I said 'documented means an authority has written and documented your travels. Which is the case for other females', but no, they don't actually have documentation.”
“Sorry for attacking you about the chargeback without knowing anything about the process.”
“Sorry for the Ryan Air assertion” etc. Just think... Just think of what a better place the world would be if people were mature enough to admit their mistakes and knew how to say sorry.
* Or of course it's even better not to speak or not to attack people without knowing things in the first place.
* The previous closed threads related to ways of travel arguments, but in the case of Djibouti, I have an issue... Okay, so you close topics to comments... What happens to the people who have been accused and attacked? So you feel it's right and okay for you to take away their right to answer? Where in the world do you see that happen? Yes, in autocratic countries. So this is an autocratic group? Can be huh, I'm not saying it shouldn't be. But I seriously think that it is really easy for people bothered NOT to read a thread. On the contrary, it takes effort to follow it up. So why do people go, follow something that bothers them and ask for the discussion to be closed? This is a real innocent question by the way, because it's seriously beyond my comprehension.
What about informing people of the posts you delete and the reasons for your deletion? Because my totally valid and related posts have been deleted and I do not take kindly to that kind of censor either. And the most ironical part that gives me a good laugh it is under a thread where the admin says “I could have just turned off comments for this post and been done with it. I’m allowing people to speak their mind freely. I don’t believe in removing posts or comments unless absolutely necessary. I prefer complete and transparent accountability.”
So I'd like to know what was it that made my post ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY to remove?
You have removed my posts. I believe I have given you enough reason to remove me from here too.
Happy and safe travels everyone."
Deletion, Removal and Banning
Then, as expected and hoped for, I was removed. By, I believe, Petro.
It was a relief.
However, I had not expected, that is, not considered one thing: That Petro would be deleting my posts too.
So she did not let anyone get a chance to even see and read them. You see, contrary to Stefan and Ric, Petro is always on FB and on the watch.
I was sort of upset at this but relieved that it was over.
I was wrong! This was only the start of another episode of blame and shame.
This is the beginning piece of a seven article series on the EPS- Every Passport Stamp Facebook group and Counting Countries podcast. The following episodes are:
Asked to Come Back
A Call to Ric Gazarian's Patrons
Threats and Controversy
A Podcast Gone Wrong
Tantrums and Rants